Reddit Escalates AI Data Wars with Perplexity Lawsuit Over Alleged Content Scraping

Legal Battle Over Training Data Intensifies

Social media platform Reddit has filed a federal lawsuit against AI company Perplexity, accusing the startup of systematically scraping user content without permission to train its artificial intelligence models. The complaint, filed in New York federal court, represents the latest escalation in the growing conflict between content platforms and AI developers over data rights and intellectual property.

This legal action follows Reddit’s similar ongoing lawsuit against AI firm Anthropic filed in June, demonstrating the platform’s aggressive strategy to control how its vast repository of user-generated content is used by artificial intelligence companies. The timing is significant as Reddit has been actively pursuing AI licensing agreements as a new revenue stream following its public listing earlier this year.

The Alleged Scraping Network

Reddit’s complaint names three additional defendants that allegedly facilitated the data collection: Lithuanian data scraping service Oxylabs, “former Russian botnet” AWMProxy, and Texas-based startup SerpApi. According to court documents, these entities helped Perplexity extract Reddit’s copyrighted content by “masking their identities, hiding their locations and disguising their web scrapers as regular people.”

The social media platform, which hosts over 100,000 specialized communities called “subreddits,” claims its user posts have become the most frequently cited source for AI-generated answers within Perplexity’s search engine. Reddit alleges that after sending Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter, the company increased citations of Reddit content forty-fold, suggesting deliberate defiance rather than compliance.

Conflicting Perspectives on Data Usage

Perplexity, which operates an AI-powered search engine, has vehemently denied the allegations. In a statement posted on Reddit’s own platform, the company argued that it doesn’t train AI models on Reddit content but merely summarizes and cites public discussions. The company described Reddit’s demands as “extortion” and accused the social media giant of using the lawsuit as leverage in its data licensing negotiations with other AI companies., as as previously reported

“A year ago, after explaining this, Reddit insisted we pay anyway, despite lawfully accessing Reddit data. Bowing to strong arm tactics just isn’t how we do business,” Perplexity stated, characterizing the legal action as a strategic move in Reddit’s broader data monetization strategy.

The Economics of AI Training Data

Reddit’s Chief Legal Officer Ben Lee framed the issue in stark terms, telling CNBC that AI companies are “locked in an arms race for quality human content” that has created an “industrial-scale ‘data laundering’ economy.” The statement highlights the enormous value that platforms like Reddit represent for AI development, given their vast collections of human conversations and moderated content.

The financial stakes are substantial. Reddit’s COO Jen Wong recently revealed that AI licensing agreements with Google and OpenAI already account for nearly 10% of the company’s revenue, underscoring why the platform is aggressively protecting this emerging business model.

Broader Industry Implications

This lawsuit reflects a growing pattern of legal challenges between content creators and AI developers. Several publishers and content platforms have filed similar suits alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted material to train large language models. The outcomes of these cases could establish crucial precedents for how publicly available web content can be used for AI training purposes.

AI researchers have long valued Reddit’s data specifically because its moderated conversations help create more natural-sounding AI responses. This quality makes Reddit content particularly desirable for training conversational AI systems, but also puts the platform in a strong position to demand compensation for access to this valuable resource.

As the case progresses through the courts, it will likely influence how other platforms approach AI data licensing and what constitutes fair use of publicly available web content for artificial intelligence training purposes.

References

• https://www.adweek.com/…/

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.