According to Financial Times News, Norway’s $2.1tn sovereign wealth fund will vote against Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1tn compensation package at the company’s annual meeting this Thursday. The oil fund, which holds a 1.1% stake making it a top-10 Tesla shareholder, announced its decision on Tuesday. While acknowledging Musk’s “visionary role” and “significant value created,” the fund expressed concerns about the sheer size of the pay deal. Tesla chair Robyn Denholm has framed the vote as essential to keeping Musk as CEO, while Musk himself has publicly threatened to walk away if shareholders block his package again.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
Why this matters beyond Tesla
This isn’t just about one CEO’s paycheck. Norway‘s fund manages money for future generations, and their vote sends a clear message about corporate governance standards. When the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund says “this pay package is too big,” other institutional investors tend to listen.
Here’s the thing: Musk’s compensation is structured as performance-based, but the sheer scale is unprecedented. We’re talking about a package that could theoretically reach $1 trillion if Tesla hits all its ambitious targets. That’s enough to make even the most growth-focused investors pause.
The Musk factor
Musk’s threat to leave if he doesn’t get paid is… well, it’s classic Elon. But it puts shareholders in a tough spot. Do you pay whatever it takes to keep a visionary leader? Or do you set boundaries around executive compensation?
Basically, Tesla’s board is asking shareholders to choose between governance principles and what they see as business necessity. And with the vote happening Thursday, we’ll soon see which way the wind blows. Will other major funds follow Norway’s lead? Or will they decide Musk is simply too valuable to risk losing?
The compensation arms race
This vote could set a precedent for executive pay across tech and beyond. If Tesla shareholders approve this package, what stops other companies from proposing similarly massive compensation deals? We might be looking at the start of a new compensation arms race.
But here’s the counter-argument: Tesla’s market cap grew from about $50 billion to over $1 trillion during the performance period Musk’s package covers. When you create that much value, maybe the compensation isn’t actually outrageous? It’s a debate that’s going to keep raging long after Thursday’s vote.
