According to Manufacturing.net, Montana Renewables has partnered with Calumet Montana Refining to commission new blending and shipping facilities capable of producing a nominal 50/50 blend of renewable and conventional jet fuel. The finished product meets both ASTM D7566 and ASTM D1655 specifications, making it drop-in compatible with all existing aviation systems without requiring modifications. Initial distribution will occur through AEG Fuels’ network to select aviation hubs across Montana, Washington, and Oregon. AEG Fuels’ Vice President of Supply NA, Landon Larson, described the collaboration as a “landmark SAF inaugural blend” that demonstrates how strategic partnerships can accelerate sustainable aviation transitions. This development represents a significant step in regional sustainable aviation fuel availability.
Table of Contents
The Critical Importance of ASTM Certification
The ASTM certification mentioned in the announcement represents far more than just regulatory compliance—it’s the aviation industry’s gold standard for safety and performance. ASTM International develops technical standards for materials, products, systems, and services across numerous industries, with aviation fuel specifications being among their most rigorous. The D7566 standard specifically covers aviation turbine fuel containing synthesized hydrocarbons, while D1655 covers conventional jet fuel. What makes this certification particularly noteworthy is that it ensures the fuel can be used in existing aircraft and infrastructure without modification, which has been a major barrier to wider aviation biofuel adoption. This eliminates the chicken-and-egg problem that has plagued many alternative fuel initiatives.
Why Montana’s Location Matters
The choice of Montana as the production base offers several strategic advantages that the source material doesn’t explore. Montana’s agricultural economy provides potential feedstock sources for renewable fuel production, while its existing energy infrastructure creates natural synergies. The state’s central western location positions it well for distribution to the Pacific Northwest markets mentioned, as well as potential expansion into other western states. More importantly, regional production reduces transportation emissions associated with fuel distribution—a critical consideration in the overall carbon footprint calculation of sustainable aviation fuels. This localized approach could become a model for other regions seeking to develop their own SAF capabilities.
Market Realities and Scaling Challenges
While the announcement represents progress, the aviation industry faces substantial hurdles in scaling sustainable fuel production to meaningful levels. Current global SAF production accounts for less than 0.1% of total jet fuel consumption, and even ambitious growth projections show it reaching only 5-10% by 2030. The 50/50 blend ratio, while practical for initial rollout, indicates that pure renewable alternatives still face technical or economic limitations. Furthermore, the partnership with AEG Fuels, while strategically sound, highlights the dependency on established fuel distribution networks that may have competing priorities. The real test will come when Montana Renewables attempts to scale beyond select regional hubs and compete on price with conventional jet fuels that benefit from decades of infrastructure optimization and scale.
The Broader Industry Transformation
This development occurs against a backdrop of increasing pressure on the aviation industry to address its environmental impact. Major airlines have made ambitious carbon reduction commitments, and corporate travel policies are increasingly factoring sustainability into procurement decisions. What makes Montana Renewables’ approach particularly interesting is their focus on creating a product that works within existing systems rather than requiring revolutionary change. This pragmatic strategy could accelerate adoption, but it also raises questions about whether incremental improvements are sufficient to meet the aviation sector’s climate challenges. The success or failure of initiatives like this will likely influence whether the industry pursues more radical technological solutions or continues with evolutionary improvements to existing infrastructure.
