According to Techmeme, former President Trump is considering an executive order that would ban states from restricting AI and threaten to halt federal funding in states that attempt AI regulations. The order would create an AI Litigation Task Force overseen by Attorney General Pam Bondi and specifically challenge state AI laws using the “dormant Commerce Clause” argument that’s been pushed by venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. Simultaneously, Google launched Gemini 3 Pro Image, nicknamed Nano Banana Pro, featuring more control, improved text rendering, and enhanced world knowledge available for free in the Gemini app. The leaked Trump order directly incorporates ideas that a16z’s Matt Perault and Jai Ramaswamy advocated earlier this year about using constitutional arguments against state AI regulations. This represents a significant federal preemption move that could reshape how AI gets regulated across state lines.
The Political Chess Game
Here’s the thing: this isn’t just about AI policy. It’s a massive political power grab disguised as innovation protection. The timing is incredibly suspicious – right as states are starting to get serious about AI regulation, Trump’s team floats this nuclear option. And they’re not even being subtle about where they got the idea – straight from Andreessen Horowitz’s playbook.
But wait, doesn’t this sound familiar? We’ve seen this movie before with other industries. The whole “dormant Commerce Clause” argument is basically saying states can’t regulate something because it might affect interstate commerce. It’s a legal theory that could completely kneecap state-level consumer protection efforts. Remember when states tried to regulate privacy or environmental standards? Same playbook, different technology.
google-s-quiet-counter-move”>Google’s Quiet Counter-Move
Meanwhile, Google’s just casually dropping Gemini 3 Pro Image like it’s no big deal. More control, better text rendering, enhanced knowledge – all for free. They’re basically saying “look, we can regulate ourselves, no need for pesky state laws.” It’s the perfect corporate response to regulatory uncertainty: make the technology so accessible and “safe” that regulation seems unnecessary.
The naming though – Nano Banana Pro? Seriously? It feels like they’re not even trying to sound serious anymore. But maybe that’s the point. When your AI tools have cute names, they seem less threatening, right?
What’s Actually at Stake
Let’s be real: this executive order idea would create absolute chaos. States like California, New York, and Illinois have been leading on tech regulation for years. They’d suddenly find their laws challenged and their funding threatened. We’d see immediate lawsuits, regulatory uncertainty, and probably a race to the bottom on AI safety standards.
And the AI Litigation Task Force overseen by Pam Bondi? That’s basically a legal war chest designed to fight states in court. It’s not about creating sensible policy – it’s about winning legal battles. The whole approach seems designed to create maximum political theater while actually doing very little to address real AI risks.
Basically, we’re watching two parallel universes: one where tech companies keep launching increasingly powerful AI tools with fun names, and another where politicians fight over who gets to make the rules. And ordinary people? We’re stuck in the middle wondering who’s actually looking out for our interests.
